Responsibility for leakage of personal data: the most famous cases

Contents:

  1. Twitter company: a fine in the amount of 450 thousand euros
  2. Google: a fine of 50 million euros
  3. Company H&M: a fine of more than 35 million euros
  4. Facebook company: $ 650 million lawsuit and $ 5 billion fine
  5. British Airways: $ 26 million fine
  6. Marriott: £ 18 million fine

Responsibility for leakage of personal data: the most famous cases

The collection, storage and processing of personal information is governed by the relevant regulatory requirements. For the leakage of personal data, the law provides for administrative liability. According to statistics, the cause of confidential information leakage is various equipment malfunctions, cyberattacks, erroneous or deliberate actions of the company's personnel.

In a number of cases, such situations led to high-profile trials, which ended in serious fines for the perpetrators of the incident and became a significant blow to their reputation.

Here are a few cases that are related to user data leakage and made a lot of noise, as well-known corporations became the culprits of the incidents.

Twitter: € 450 thousand

In 2018, Twitter was fined € 450,000 by an Irish court for leaking sensitive user data. The cause of the incident was a malfunction in the functioning of microblogging. According to a company spokesman, the organization had overlaps with staffing during the Christmas holidays. The situation led to a technical malfunction, due to which hidden user accounts were freely available if the account owner changed the e-mail associated with the account.

Google: € 50 million

In 2020, the French supervisory authority awarded Google with three large fines, which totaled 50 million euros. The regulator said that the reason for the incident was the lack of transparency in the rules for processing personal information of users. Services owned by Google automatically placed cookies on the user's device before receiving his consent. This is a violation of the law on the collection of personal data.

In 2019, a US court sentenced Google to a $ 170 million fine for violating the federal COPPA law by YouTube, which is owned by Google. The violation was that the service collected and processed data from underage users without the knowledge of parents or legal representatives.

H&M: over 35 million euros

A large clothing manufacturer was fined over 35 million euros by a German court for leaking personal data of employees. In the course of the investigation, it turned out that the company illegally collected personal data of personnel, which relate to religion, health, leisure preferences, etc. The purpose of the event, representatives of H&M called the search and implementation of effective methods to increase the productivity of employees.

No less high-profile was the case of the German electronics company Notebooksbilliger. The court fined the company for the unrestricted use of video surveillance, which was carried out in retail and warehouse premises.

Facebook: $ 650 million lawsuit and $ 5 billion fine

Facebook was among the penalties for using the function of recognizing and marking faces in a photo without the prior permission of social network users. A class action lawsuit was filed against the infringer in Illinois, and the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. Over 1.6 million social media users have received a refund of $ 340.

This is far from the largest amount that Facebook had to pay for a violation in this area. In 2019, the company was ordered by a court to pay a record high fine of $ 5 billion for an opaque personal data processing policy. During the investigation, it turned out that Facebook was transferring private information about users to third parties.

British Airways: $ 26 million

The British airline became a party to the lawsuit and was fined 20 million euros for leaking customer and employee data. As a result of the hack, the personal information of about 429 thousand people was in the public domain. Initially, the court wanted to fine the culprit in the amount of $ 238 million, but due to the difficult situation in the air transportation market, British Airways managed to appeal the sentence and achieve a reduction in the penalty.

Marriott: £ 18 million

The largest player in the hospitality industry was also hit by a cyberattack that made the personal data of 338 million customers publicly available. The initial amount of the fine was 100 million pounds, but later the court reduced the amount to 18 million due to the difficult situation in the tourist services market.

All these examples clearly show how important it is to comply with the requirements for the protection of personal data and the GDPR regulation, any site that allows a European citizen to enter it is the subject responsible for compliance with the GDPR. A4 Law Firm is ready to provide professional assistance in the preparation of documents for the website and the development of the necessary mechanisms to comply with legal requirements, monitors innovations related to the protection of personal data, and is ready to advise you on all issues.

REMAINED
QUESTIONS?

Актуальные новости и статьи

11January
Copyright protection for software and computer games is an issue that lawyers often face in connection with the active development of the gaming industry. Computer games are complex objects of intellectual property. Even if the developer registers a trademark and files a patent, some elements can still be used by third parties. The least protected objects include source code, game characters, music, graphics.
Узнать подробнее
31December
Due to the development of cryptocurrencies and the growth of their value, legislators in many countries pay close attention to them and develop appropriate regulation. At the moment, Estonia is one of the most attractive jurisdictions for doing cryptocurrency business.
Узнать подробнее
30December
A marketplace is an online platform designed for buying and selling goods. The marketplace acts as an intermediary between the buyer and seller, providing them with a convenient platform for placing goods and buying them.
Узнать подробнее
29December
With the development of pop culture, the layer of its influence on society increases. At the time of 2021, there is a huge fan base, divided into societies, depending on their favorite work. Accordingly, in order to express their own creative potential, the fan base expresses it in the form of their own interpretation.
Узнать подробнее
28December
Gibraltar is a British Overseas Territory located on the border of Europe and Africa and is an extremely attractive jurisdiction. Gibraltar is currently in the stage of economic growth, attracting a large number of investments from all over the world. Also, this jurisdiction is considered one jurisdiction with a high level of confidentiality and a fairly moderate tax regime. The first step in transferring your assets to Gibraltar is to set up a company. This is quite simple to do compared to other offshore jurisdictions.
Узнать подробнее
27December
In the legislation of the Russian Federation, there is no mandatory requirement for registration of copyright. Copyright arises at the time of creation of the object, therefore, there is no obligation to legally enforce the right. Despite this, attribution disputes are not uncommon for courts, and a deposit procedure exists to avoid lengthy litigation.
Узнать подробнее
24December
In connection with the general transition to online, business owners are increasingly faced with the need to create a website. Online business presentation increases your sales and brand awareness. At the same time, you should take a responsible attitude to the legal registration of relations with the developers of the site, since mistakes in drawing up a contract can lead to extremely negative consequences.
Узнать подробнее
23December
When deciding to block a site, government agencies are required to act in accordance with Federal Law No. 149. This law provides a large number of grounds for blocking any resource. Article 15.1 149-FZ and Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 26, 2012 No. 1101 establish a list of bodies authorized to make a decision on blocking a site, and also introduces a register of sites containing information prohibited in Russia. Any resource for which such a decision has been made is included in this register. Inclusion of a site in such a register means restricting access to it in Russia. Internet providers rely on this registry and, when any site gets there, they suspend access to it.
Узнать подробнее
NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIPTION
By pressing the subscribe button I agree to the  Privacy Policy
a4lawfirm.ru
г.Москва г. Москва, Новоданиловская наб., дом 6, корп. 1, БЦ "Данилов плаза" +7 (499) 841-05-05 info@a4lawfirm.ru